Celebrating 25 Years of DWC DWConline.com
   

Click Here for Valuable Free Information from DWC

DWC MAGAZINE
Conference
Reader Service
Cover Stories
Editorial
Industry Profiles
Market Trends
Take Note
News Makers
Business Issues
Design Solutions
Design Perspectives
Back Issues
Article Index

DWC & You
Latest Products
Buyer's Guide
International Directory
Classified Ad
Newsletter
Bookstore
Media Kit
Calendar
Website Directory
Links
Contact DWC

DWC Home | Magazine | Back Issues | Aug 2002 | Design Perspectives

DWCimage  More Articles by Karla J. Nielson
 More Design Perspectives

Design Perspectives

Making Room for Kids
As children grow and develop, so too should their very personal spaces.


by Karla Nielson, Allied Member, ASID; Member, WCAA

A lucrative market today can be found in the design and furnishing of children’s spaces—from the nursery to the older teen or even adult child living back at home. For the mid-income customer, this market is fairly new.

Through most of the history of the United States, attention has been given to children’s spaces only by the very well to do. The majority of Americans felt no compelling need to indulge children. In fact, the view of children as recent as pre-World War I was substantially different than it is today.

Let’s examine a few of these attitude changes and see how they translate into making us as professionals more astute and aware of how to help clients create environments for their children that will give them a place for growth and security.

A LOOK OVER THE SHOULDER

My mother, born in 1919, was the oldest of eight children, and her parents were farmers. She has written dozens of stories about her childhood and has won several awards for her writings. She talks, humorously, about being the “victim of child labor,” and compares the attitudes of her father (gentle, kind) to her grandfather (the Master Sergeant) as they encouraged their little broods to help in the fields.

She tells also of going to dances as a teenager where the boys her age moaned and sought sympathy for the long hours they had spent thinning beets and showed their red-stained fingers to prove their plight. Mother and her friends had soaked their fingers in lemon juice so as to not let on that they, too, had spent long hours in the hot sun bent over pulling out baby beets to make room for some to grow large enough to be harvested at about seven pounds each, which made harvesting an even more labor-intense chore than thinning!

When extended families and friends gathered for large meals, my mother was put in charge of caring for the younger children while all the adults ate and enjoyed each other’s company. Much later, the children were allowed to eat what was left over.

These were common practices and attitudes throughout America since its Pilgrim days. Children could be seen, but not heard; children were to be obedient, work hard, show trustworthiness and industry, grow up to emulate their parents, and defer to parents on all matters of authority.

On the more positive side, my mother also writes of delightful times on fishing trips with extended families and friends, of times of sweet reverie, of complete safety and security free from fear of harm, free from influences that were evil—a freedom that today’s children do not enjoy.

Probably the great change in attitude toward children had its roots in the Victorian Era where, in upper-crust families, the English motto of “only replacing yourself” became a well-healed person’s philosophy. This certainly made dividing up the family fortune much easier.

Children who were indulged were also expected to take their places properly in society, to keep up the family’s traditions and live a noble life to honor their heritage, and quite possibly to carry on the family business. These, too, are positive attributes of a free people.

HAPPY DAYS

In the post-World War II era, children began to be exposed to far more external influences, including television in addition to radio, which had been a part of American households for about 20 years previous. They also had, with their parents’ increased disposable income, access to their own automobiles. They spent more time together in public and compared notes about what they wanted to be when they grew up, which often varied from the parents’ jobs.

Bedrooms became places for pajama parties and repositories for teen idol posters. Although sterile in comparison to today’s decorating styles, these rooms nonetheless became fashion statements. Although today we look back with wistfulness on the naiveté of that era, it was a daring, dramatic leap forward in thinking compared to earlier eras.

THE SIXTIES AND SEVENTIES

In the ’60s and early ’70s, with hopeless wars being fought in Southeast Asia, a new attitude of rebellion developed among the youth. They began to despise what they saw as the hypocritical lives and actions of those in “the establishment.” Coupled with the introduction and widespread availability of consciousness-altering and hallucinatory drugs, many older children clearly abandoned their parents’ goals and dreams.

Ironically, many of these rebellious souls eventually found themselves, and some grew up to be much more like their parents than they ever would have dreamed. Some went from hippie to yuppie, from despising wealth to jealously guarding or indulgently spending it. Others are still trying to find themselves, and have little responsibility in their lives (old hippies).

I clearly remember colors from those decades, which reflected the intensity of the drug era coupled with Eastern Asian philosophy and the American bicentennial: electric blue, shocking pink, brilliant orange, clear American red, East Indian purple and sunshine yellow. I look back on those bedrooms and wonder how the children of my generation ever physiologically slowed down enough to rest and sleep.

I also shutter at the color combinations and maintain that it was one of the worst color and design eras known to mankind. As the cycle of color popularity rolls onward, many of these colors have resurfaced, made popular because of video screens, which scream over-stimulation as they vie for our attention and get us to link to an advertiser’s site. They are still psychologically horrific.

THE EIGHTIES AND NINETIES

In the ’80s and ’90s, Americans in general have begun to see greater value in their children, cherishing them and spending much more time with them to nurture and encourage them, to help them excel in their schooling, sports, the fine arts or performing arts, and to develop their unique characters.

For some, this push to making children become “the best” at grades or extracurricular activities gives the parent(s) validity—the child accomplishes dreams the parent personally was unable to do but desired to do. At times, the motivation for parental encouragement is vicarious accomplishment, becoming a badge of honor for the parent.

Many have taken childhood away from their children by pushing them to higher levels of excellence—forcing adult goals on children. They justify this action as a way to give the child a “competitive edge” when they are ready to enter graduate school, the marketplace or kindergarten. Parents with this attitude will want their children’s rooms to be serious and support study and practice. They also may want their child to have things other children their age cannot. They want the child to be more special than any other child yet to arrive on earth. This type of optimism or determination needs psychiatric help. After all, children still need a little time to be children.

Parents’ personal philosophy will also be a determining factor in furnishing children’s rooms, because so much of it is rooted in molding the child in fanciful, indulgent ways.

THE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT

The continual development of technology has made a big impact on what children think, what they do, and how they behave today. Whereas two generations ago the child did most of his or her homework at the kitchen table, now there may be multiple personal computers in a home, often with one right in the child’s room.

Rather than interact with the family or friends, today’s children often are more isolated, spending virtual time rather than real time with others. Their world is one of removed, impersonal connections. As a result, college-aged kids today are often brighter, but have less-developed social skills and common sense than students of less than a generation ago. They have poorer manners and feel entitled to receive more. They have lived life in a bubble.

If you have concerns about the exposure of your clients’ children to questionable Internet sites, then the location of computers should surely be addressed. Many astute parents today are placing computers where adults can monitor them. Others, sadly, do not want to be bothered by or to be responsible for their children. I call this the “buy them off attitude”—if you spend enough money and buy enough toys for a child, then he or she will be occupied and not bother you. This attitude rarely results in well-adjusted, ethical or hard-working adults.

SAFE SPACE—CREATIVE DREAMING

Today many parents encourage their children to dream and think, play and imagine in the safety of their rooms. Relatively few children have the out-of-doors freedom that my mother enjoyed; today the fear of harm or abduction is too great. The alternative is to create a fanciful child’s world inside the security of locked and alarmed homes, which give children safe space.

Thematic decorating contributes to the virtual reality of this space. Choose a theme and run with it is great decorating advice. Contemporary child theorists often agree that a child who is exposed to stimulating fantasy will grow to be creative thinkers and problem-solvers for an ever-more-complex and problem-riddled world. They will be the developers of new technology; they will explore the horizons of the future without hesitation. The seeds are planted within the walls of their own personal spaces—their bedrooms.

Other philosophy theorizes that the more clearly defined the visual images, the less creative the child. Room for imagination—sometimes entire walls are left white or made into large chalkboards or pegboards—allows more opportunities for creativity.

THE EMPOWERED CHILD

Today’s children make decisions. They are unaffected by spending their parents’ money. And youth who are allowed to be a part of the decorating process are delighted to select their own themes that reflect their own special interests and dreams.

With multiple coordinating patterns, every room can be unique. Whether “guy” or “girl” stuff is featured, the themes offered through wall covering and fabric books make creating a wonderful space a grand adventure for the child.

DISPOSABLE INCOME

Another reason Americans are spending more money furnishing their children’s rooms is that parents in general have access to more disposable income.

Young parents who have grown up with new technology, cars and credit cards provided by their parents are very fashion-conscious. These under 30-something mothers and fathers, happily furnish the child’s room in a complete decorating package. From the SUV (sport utility vehicle) strollers and Baby Gap clothing to coordinated decorating ensembles, this group of parents aims to own quality goods and enjoy the best that life has to offer for their children.

That is not to say that only young parents are guilty of wanting the best for the child. Older parents with young children tend to enjoy higher levels of professional income. They often want the room to be a wonderland of delight for the child (and perhaps more for themselves).

JUST DO IT

A final word of advice: designs for decorating children’s rooms are transient at best, so go ahead have fun! Except for decorating children’s or teen’s rooms in all black or all yellow (psychologically devastating colors), children’s rooms should be viewed as changeable as the child grows.

Make the space wonderful, but don’t feel that you are doing it “for good.” Think in terms of flexibility. As children move through various stages of physical and emotional development, the decorating should be able to change with them. And let the parent enjoy the experience as well, because when all is said and done, the room is as much for the paying parent as it is for the child.


Karla J. Nielson, Allied ASID, WCAA, is assistant professor of design at Brigham Young University. She is a practicing interior designer and has authored several books including Window Treatments, Understanding Fabrics and Interiors: An Introduction, 3rd Ed. Nielson is a regular correspondent for Draperies & Window Coverings addressing the areas of fashion, education and merchandising.




Sign Up for the DWC Newsletter
 

Home | Magazine | Directory | Latest Products | Subscribe | Contact

©Copyright 2007 L.C. Clark Publishing Co./ Draperies & Window Coverings Magazine